This article first appeared on Today in Alternate History.
May 2, 1972 - World Learns of the Existence of the Chronovisor
Tthe Italian weekly news magazine La Domenica del Corriere
published photographs of Christ's crucifixion in a sensationally
controversial article titled "A Machine That Photographs The Past Has
Finally Been Invented."
Within hours the world learned the existence of a functional time-viewer
in the Vatican. Initial skepticism was swept away by recorded footage of
the the final days of Jesus that was transmitted on terrestrial
television later that eventful summer. This
shocker triggered the release of further revelations. It was widely
reported that Papal authorities supposedly held the device in a
privatized cell within the Palace of the Government protected around the
clock by Swiss Guards.
Built in the 1950s, The Chronovisor
was reportedly a large cabinet with a cathode ray tube for viewing the
received events and a series of buttons, levers, and other controls for
selecting the time and the location to be viewed. It could also locate
and track specific individuals. Development had been led by the Italian
Benedictine monk Pellegrino Ernetti and the Nobel peace prize winning
Italian physicist Enrico Fermi with assistance from famous rocket
scientist Wernher von Braun. He had been able to contribute key
technical lessons from his involvement in the failed development of Die Glocke a decade earlier.
Skepticism
over its existence was replaced with a new cynicism after Ernetti
warned of the emergence of the "most fearsome dictatorship the world has
ever seen." This could only be by the Papal Authorities, and it was
surmised that rogue elements in the Roman Catholic Church had been
developing a secret agenda ever since the Second Vatican Council. That
agenda would validate the teachings of the Bible in order to reverse the
sharp decline in global faith since World War 2.
Oddly enough,
one of the many implications of the whole affair was to draw attention
to the role of Roman authorities in the Crucifixion. Combined with the
acute problems of security in the Vatican City, the Papal Authorities
were forced to relocate to Rio de Janeiro with a new enclave built in
the shadow of the Art Deco statue Christ the Redeemer. This move had the
consequential effect of rooting the Roman Catholic Church more deeply
into the southern hemisphere, leading to a succession of Latin and
African popes.
In 2002, Father François Brune would publish Petite Renaissance,
a wide-ranging study of ecclesial transformation. Nevertheless, by the
time of his death seventeen years later, no further recordings had been
released, and the existence of the Chronovisor remained a mystery. Investigators routinely pleaded for access, hoping to solve murders and disappearances such as that of Amelia Earhart.
Author's Note:
In
reality, the existence or functionality of the chronovisor has never
been confirmed. The alleged existence has fueled a whole series of
conspiracy theories but is widely debunked as an elaborate hoax.
OTL
Father Pellegrino Ernetti six years after the Vatican issued a decree
in which it warned that "anyone using, an instrument of such
characteristics would be excommunicated" said, "Pope Pius
XII forbade us to disclose any details about this device because the
machine was very dangerous. It can restrain the freedom of man."
I can't make sense of this said "subframe" to the painting, Jesus in the Grain Field, by German female artist, Johannes Raphael Wehle (i.e., an alleged "subframe", by Mexican researcher Edgar Gómez... see, bit.ly/42ERwCq-- translated to English)... as it appears more authentic than the final painted rendering (a detailed version of the said "subframe", can be found at, bit.ly/3MrW89x).
ReplyDelete.
And I've asked myself:... Why would an artist decide to render a painting that/ which is less effective than the "subframe" from which it is said to be based upon?... and, if this "subframe" belongs to Johannes Raphael Wehle, could it be a photograph that-- somehow!-- wound up in her possession? Could a copy of this "subframe"-- or the original!-- been passed on to her?... but, then, if this alleged "photograph"/ "subframe" was made after her death, how could she have used it as the basis of her work, Jesus in the Grain Field? A true mystery, indeed!
.
To close... a possible assist to the verification of the authenticity of the alleged "Chronovisor photograph", is a comparison of the image of Christ depicted therein to the images taken by photographer, Secondo Pia, of the Shroud of Turin, the 3D reconstructions of the person of Christ obtained from the "3D information" discovered within the fabric of the Shroud and the information to be gleaned directly from the Shroud itself... though, in each of the latter comparisons, images of a deceased-- yet risen!-- individual (see, i.pinimg.com/originals/da/f3/3b/daf33bc9fb042cc7c864157f9349697a.jpg and, youtube.com/watch?v=bSBeeyO4Hxc [or, New Astonishing Phenomena detected on the SHROUD OF TURIN]).
.
All the Best!... and may God find you Blessworthy!